Sword and Scabbard
1300-1350 (made)
Artist/Maker | |
Place of origin |
This blade for a long sword (‘katana’) carries a gold inlaid inscription attributing it to Masamune (1264-1344). Masamune is generally regarded as the greatest swordsmith in the history of the Japanese sword. His blades, mostly daggers (‘tanto’), were both strong and beautiful and could cut extremely efficiently. Many of the technological advances accredited to Masamune were practical ones brought about by experience gained during the invasions of Japan by the Mongols in 1274 and 1281. During the severe fighting many blades had been damaged and had broken or chipped right through the tempered edge and into the softer untempered section. This rendered the blade useless as it could no longer be re-ground. Masamune was able to manufacture blades with a wider tempered edge so that a damaged blade could be re-ground many times before the softer steel was reached.
Katana of the Kamakura period (1185-1333) were often shortened as fighting techniques changed from cavalry to foot combat: the long curved sword was better suited to fighting from horseback. The few known katana produced by Masamune were extremely long and in later centuries were shortened to suit the different styles of combat of those periods. This shortening process potentially removed any extant signature, although in later years a practice developed of inlaying signatures in gold into the hilt of shortened blades, as in this sword. The hilt has on one side of the blade the gold inlaid signature of Masamune and on the other side the gold inlaid signature and monogram of a member of the Hon’ami family of sword appraisers, who attributed the blade to Masamune.
The authenticity of the blade and the interpretation of the gold-inlaid attribution must remain subject to question, although the current opinion is that it is indeed a blade by Masamune. If it is not by the master swordsmith himself, then it certainly dates from his period or very shortly after.
Katana of the Kamakura period (1185-1333) were often shortened as fighting techniques changed from cavalry to foot combat: the long curved sword was better suited to fighting from horseback. The few known katana produced by Masamune were extremely long and in later centuries were shortened to suit the different styles of combat of those periods. This shortening process potentially removed any extant signature, although in later years a practice developed of inlaying signatures in gold into the hilt of shortened blades, as in this sword. The hilt has on one side of the blade the gold inlaid signature of Masamune and on the other side the gold inlaid signature and monogram of a member of the Hon’ami family of sword appraisers, who attributed the blade to Masamune.
The authenticity of the blade and the interpretation of the gold-inlaid attribution must remain subject to question, although the current opinion is that it is indeed a blade by Masamune. If it is not by the master swordsmith himself, then it certainly dates from his period or very shortly after.
Object details
Category | |
Object type | |
Parts | This object consists of 4 parts.
|
Brief description | sword blade (katana), Met, Japan, swords and daggers shirasaya hilt for a sword blade (katana), Met, Japan, swords and daggers shirasaya for a sword blade (katana), Met, Japan, swords and daggers textile cover for a sword, Met, Japan, swords and daggers |
Physical description | Blade for a Japanese long sword (katana) with inlaid signature of Masamune |
Style | |
Marks and inscriptions |
|
Object history | Purchased from Mr. Alfred Dobrée (11 Palace Street, Buckingham Gate, S.W.), accessioned in 1912. This acquisition information reflects that found in the Asia Department registers, as part of a 2022 provenance research project. |
Summary | This blade for a long sword (‘katana’) carries a gold inlaid inscription attributing it to Masamune (1264-1344). Masamune is generally regarded as the greatest swordsmith in the history of the Japanese sword. His blades, mostly daggers (‘tanto’), were both strong and beautiful and could cut extremely efficiently. Many of the technological advances accredited to Masamune were practical ones brought about by experience gained during the invasions of Japan by the Mongols in 1274 and 1281. During the severe fighting many blades had been damaged and had broken or chipped right through the tempered edge and into the softer untempered section. This rendered the blade useless as it could no longer be re-ground. Masamune was able to manufacture blades with a wider tempered edge so that a damaged blade could be re-ground many times before the softer steel was reached. Katana of the Kamakura period (1185-1333) were often shortened as fighting techniques changed from cavalry to foot combat: the long curved sword was better suited to fighting from horseback. The few known katana produced by Masamune were extremely long and in later centuries were shortened to suit the different styles of combat of those periods. This shortening process potentially removed any extant signature, although in later years a practice developed of inlaying signatures in gold into the hilt of shortened blades, as in this sword. The hilt has on one side of the blade the gold inlaid signature of Masamune and on the other side the gold inlaid signature and monogram of a member of the Hon’ami family of sword appraisers, who attributed the blade to Masamune. The authenticity of the blade and the interpretation of the gold-inlaid attribution must remain subject to question, although the current opinion is that it is indeed a blade by Masamune. If it is not by the master swordsmith himself, then it certainly dates from his period or very shortly after. |
Collection | |
Accession number | M.20:1 to 4-1912 |
About this object record
Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
Record created | February 12, 2004 |
Record URL |
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest