Pattern chair thumbnail 1
Pattern chair thumbnail 2
+2
images
Not on display

Pattern chair

Pattern Chair
ca. 1750-60 (made)
Artist/Maker
Place of origin

This grand armchair was evidently made as a ‘pattern chair’, showing several different options for the decoration of the arms and the legs. Some pattern chairs were made to commission for a client, so that he or she could then decide between the options proposed. This example, however, seems to have been made for display in the maker’s showroom rather than as a prototype of a chair for practical use, for it is too large to be comfortable, especially in the length of the seat. The naturalistic rococo ornament on the back and arms is combined with much more architectural ornament, in the style of William Kent, on the legs. It is unlikely that any customer would have ordered a suite mixing up these motifs, but they demonstrate very well the range of details that the maker could offer.

The ornament resembles designs by the carver Matthias Lock, but we do not know who made this ambitious chair.

Object details

Category
Object type
Parts
This object consists of 2 parts.

  • Armchair
  • Back Panel
TitlePattern chair (popular title)
Materials and techniques
Carved and gilded wood, with upholstered seat, back and arms
Brief description
An oversize giltwood armchair, made as a pattern chair. The seat and back are upholstered in green velvet, the frame, with serpentine seat and back, shows multiple patterns of carving, as do the scrolling cabriole legs.
Physical description
Armchair, of carved and gilded wood of rococo design, the seat, back and arm pads upholstered in dark green silk velvet. The shaped back is carved with asymmetrical scrollwork, with beading around the inner border, imitating the close nailing sometimes used on the edge of upholstered panels. The arms terminate in volutes. The arm supports are of square section carved with scale, money, husk and strapwork designs. The scrolling legs are of cabriole or console form. There are five different set of ornament on the arms and five different designs on the front and back legs. The upholstery, which dates, like the gilding, from the 1960s, is on removeable pads in the back and the arms (a technique known as à chassis upholstery) but the upholstery of the seat has been fixed in place.
Dimensions
  • Height: 114cm
  • Width: 78cm
  • Depth: 82cm
  • Seat height: 46cm
  • Seat at front width: 70cm
  • Seat at back width: 61cm
  • Seat depth: 59cm
checked by LW 14.1.10
Style
Gallery label
(1969)
The fact that the carving on the arms and the legs is not the same on each side suggests that this is a carver's pattern chair, made as a prototype when a new set of chairs was on order, with alternative proposals for some of the carved detail. The chair has recently been re-gilded and re-upholstered.
The traditional English armchair either had a wooden openwork and carved back or a fully padded one with no carved wood showing. About 1750 a new form made its appearance and this was generally termed a 'French chair'. The French preferred to construct the back as a carved frame with padding in the centre. In order not to damage the delicate carving when the chair was being uphostered, the padding was usually fitted to an inner frame or stretcher, which could be removed and was retained by small clips - a feature also to be seen on this chair. Later any chair with an upholstered back of a curvilinear form came to be known as a 'French chair'.
(1976)
This carver's pattern chair was made as a prototype, when a new set of chairs was on order, with alternative proposals for some of the carved details. The design of the chair is in the style of Matthias Lock (d.1765). (John Hardy)
Object history
The provenance is not known before the chair was purchased from Messrs Phillips of Hitchin (Registered file 59/1252). When acquired by the Museum the frame was painted in two colours and upholstered in yellow silk damask. The chair was re-gilded in the early 1960s. The earliest Museum photos show it in this form. It was re-upholstered with a blue material and a blue cushion made to match in 1969. The blue colouring of the tufts on the current upholstery may suggest that the now-green velvet was originally more blue.

Historical significance: The chair is probably a carver's pattern chair, made to show clients a choice of carved decoration. The form of the chair, with a carved frame to the upholstered back, was newly fashionable in the 1750s, when such chairs were descrbed as 'French chairs', though appearing in English pattern books. The design of the chair is in the style of Matthias Lock (d.1765).
Historical context
This chair, showing several patterns of carving, was presumably made for use in a cabinet-maker's showroom or shop. The scale of the armchair is largely than standard and this may have been deliberate, to make the chair suitable for public showing.
Production
The design is in the style of Matthias Lock
Subjects depicted
Summary
This grand armchair was evidently made as a ‘pattern chair’, showing several different options for the decoration of the arms and the legs. Some pattern chairs were made to commission for a client, so that he or she could then decide between the options proposed. This example, however, seems to have been made for display in the maker’s showroom rather than as a prototype of a chair for practical use, for it is too large to be comfortable, especially in the length of the seat. The naturalistic rococo ornament on the back and arms is combined with much more architectural ornament, in the style of William Kent, on the legs. It is unlikely that any customer would have ordered a suite mixing up these motifs, but they demonstrate very well the range of details that the maker could offer.

The ornament resembles designs by the carver Matthias Lock, but we do not know who made this ambitious chair.
Collection
Accession number
W.5:1-1959

About this object record

Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.

You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.

Suggest feedback

Record createdJune 17, 1998
Record URL
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest