Brooch
1916-1917 (hallmarked)
| Artist/Maker | |
| Place of origin |
Object Type
Silver brooches were popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. They often had inscriptions such as 'Mother', like this one, or of names characteristic of the period, such as 'Florence', 'Maud', 'Beatrice' and 'Grace'.
People
George and Robert Sydenham formed a partnership with Claude Tebbitt which ended in 1875. When George died in 1910, he left an estate worth the then large sum of £14,729, an indication of the firm's prosperity. The firm, which had premises in Tenby Street, Birmingham, became a limited company in the same year. An advertisement in 1913 describes the firm as manufacturers of diamond and gem-set jewellery. It ceased trading in 1930.
Place
Birmingham was the largest centre of jewellery making in Britain. Estimates of the number of people employed in the trade and its branches in 1913 ranged from 40,000 to 80,000.
Time
The First World War had a huge impact on jewellery making in Birmingham, as many of the younger men joined the armed forces. Yet the trade continued, and many firms made buttons, badges and parts for munitions. Women, already working in significant numbers in some parts of the trade, took on further work. However, the union and employers agreed in June 1916 that 'no women or girl labour employed during the War is to be retained to the detriment of male labour'.
Silver brooches were popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. They often had inscriptions such as 'Mother', like this one, or of names characteristic of the period, such as 'Florence', 'Maud', 'Beatrice' and 'Grace'.
People
George and Robert Sydenham formed a partnership with Claude Tebbitt which ended in 1875. When George died in 1910, he left an estate worth the then large sum of £14,729, an indication of the firm's prosperity. The firm, which had premises in Tenby Street, Birmingham, became a limited company in the same year. An advertisement in 1913 describes the firm as manufacturers of diamond and gem-set jewellery. It ceased trading in 1930.
Place
Birmingham was the largest centre of jewellery making in Britain. Estimates of the number of people employed in the trade and its branches in 1913 ranged from 40,000 to 80,000.
Time
The First World War had a huge impact on jewellery making in Birmingham, as many of the younger men joined the armed forces. Yet the trade continued, and many firms made buttons, badges and parts for munitions. Women, already working in significant numbers in some parts of the trade, took on further work. However, the union and employers agreed in June 1916 that 'no women or girl labour employed during the War is to be retained to the detriment of male labour'.
Object details
| Categories | |
| Object type | |
| Materials and techniques | Silver, engraved, with applied decoration in red and yellow gold |
| Brief description | Mother brooch |
| Dimensions |
|
| Gallery label |
|
| Object history | Made by Sydenham Brothers, Birmingham |
| Summary | Object Type Silver brooches were popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. They often had inscriptions such as 'Mother', like this one, or of names characteristic of the period, such as 'Florence', 'Maud', 'Beatrice' and 'Grace'. People George and Robert Sydenham formed a partnership with Claude Tebbitt which ended in 1875. When George died in 1910, he left an estate worth the then large sum of £14,729, an indication of the firm's prosperity. The firm, which had premises in Tenby Street, Birmingham, became a limited company in the same year. An advertisement in 1913 describes the firm as manufacturers of diamond and gem-set jewellery. It ceased trading in 1930. Place Birmingham was the largest centre of jewellery making in Britain. Estimates of the number of people employed in the trade and its branches in 1913 ranged from 40,000 to 80,000. Time The First World War had a huge impact on jewellery making in Birmingham, as many of the younger men joined the armed forces. Yet the trade continued, and many firms made buttons, badges and parts for munitions. Women, already working in significant numbers in some parts of the trade, took on further work. However, the union and employers agreed in June 1916 that 'no women or girl labour employed during the War is to be retained to the detriment of male labour'. |
| Collection | |
| Accession number | CIRC.74-1966 |
About this object record
Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
| Record created | March 27, 2003 |
| Record URL |
Download as: JSON
