Ewer
1500-1600 (made)
Artist/Maker | |
Place of origin |
There was a great volume of traffic in inlaid metalwork throughout the Mamluk period. The large number of Mamluk inlaid objects which have survived with their inlay intact are the results of this trade. This continuity in trade hides a difference between 14th and 15th century Mamluk products. For most of the 14th century the main patrons of Mamluk metalwork were undoubtedly the Mamluk sultans and emirs, while those of the end of the 14th and 15th century are less overtly Mamluk and leave a space for European insignia to be added. By the second half of the 15th century the Europeans dominate the industry, supplying the metal and sometimes the objects themselves to be decorated. Traditional forms are less common and often replaced by Italian ones indicating an industry geared to export.
There is ongoing scholarly debate about the origin of so-called Veneto-Saracenic metalwork, regarding whether it was manufactured in Venice or in Mamluk Syria and Egypt and whether it was made by Venetian or Muslim craftsmen. A further complication is that metal objects are known to have been produced in Venice for decoration in the Near East. James Allan has identified two groups of such wares which he has attributed to Cairo and Damascus, rather than Italy, based on their decorative scheme. Although this ewer fits into his Cairo group with its linear inlay, background decoration of finely scrolling stems and areas highlighted with silver, the shape is so Italian in form that it seems to have been manufactured there.
There is ongoing scholarly debate about the origin of so-called Veneto-Saracenic metalwork, regarding whether it was manufactured in Venice or in Mamluk Syria and Egypt and whether it was made by Venetian or Muslim craftsmen. A further complication is that metal objects are known to have been produced in Venice for decoration in the Near East. James Allan has identified two groups of such wares which he has attributed to Cairo and Damascus, rather than Italy, based on their decorative scheme. Although this ewer fits into his Cairo group with its linear inlay, background decoration of finely scrolling stems and areas highlighted with silver, the shape is so Italian in form that it seems to have been manufactured there.
Object details
Categories | |
Object type | |
Materials and techniques | Brass, engraved and damascened with silver |
Brief description | Oval brass ewer with trefoil lip decorated with overall damascening and silver overlay, Venetian-Saracenic, 16th century |
Physical description | Oval brass ewer, with a narrow neck and trefoil lip, with a round foot and tinned copper scroll handle. Decorated all-over with silver damascene and floral arabesques. |
Dimensions |
|
Style | |
Credit line | Given by Dr W L Hildburgh, FSA |
Object history | There is ongoing scholarly debate about the origin of so-called Veneto-Saracenic metalwork regarding whether it was manufactured in Venice or in Mamluk Syria and Egypt and whether it was made by Venetian or Muslim craftsmen. A further complication is that metal objects are known to have been produced in Venice for decoration in the Near East. James Allan has identified two groups of such wares which he has attributed to Cairo and Damascus, rather than Italy, based on their decorative scheme. Although this ewer fits into to his Cairo group with its linear inlay, background decoration of finely scrolling stems and areas highlighted with silver, the shape is so Italian in form that it seems to have been manufactured there. |
Historical context | There was a great volume of traffic in inlaid metalwork throughout the Mamluk period. The large number of Mamluk inlaid objects which have survived with their inlay intact are the results of this trade. This continuity in trade hides a difference between 14th and 15th century Mamluk products. For most of the 14th century the main patrons of Mamluk metalwork were undoubtedly the Mamluk sultans and emirs, while those of the end of the 14th and 15th century are less overtly Mamluk and leave a space for European insignia to be added. By the second half of the 15th century the Europeans dominate the industry, supplying the metal and sometimes the objects themselves to be decorated. Traditional forms are less common and often replaced by Italian ones indicating an industry geared to export. |
Subject depicted | |
Summary | There was a great volume of traffic in inlaid metalwork throughout the Mamluk period. The large number of Mamluk inlaid objects which have survived with their inlay intact are the results of this trade. This continuity in trade hides a difference between 14th and 15th century Mamluk products. For most of the 14th century the main patrons of Mamluk metalwork were undoubtedly the Mamluk sultans and emirs, while those of the end of the 14th and 15th century are less overtly Mamluk and leave a space for European insignia to be added. By the second half of the 15th century the Europeans dominate the industry, supplying the metal and sometimes the objects themselves to be decorated. Traditional forms are less common and often replaced by Italian ones indicating an industry geared to export. There is ongoing scholarly debate about the origin of so-called Veneto-Saracenic metalwork, regarding whether it was manufactured in Venice or in Mamluk Syria and Egypt and whether it was made by Venetian or Muslim craftsmen. A further complication is that metal objects are known to have been produced in Venice for decoration in the Near East. James Allan has identified two groups of such wares which he has attributed to Cairo and Damascus, rather than Italy, based on their decorative scheme. Although this ewer fits into his Cairo group with its linear inlay, background decoration of finely scrolling stems and areas highlighted with silver, the shape is so Italian in form that it seems to have been manufactured there. |
Bibliographic references |
|
Collection | |
Accession number | M.31-1946 |
About this object record
Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
Record created | March 11, 2003 |
Record URL |
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest