Teapot
1725-1730 (made)
| Artist/Maker | |
| Place of origin |
Object Type
The form and decoration of this teapot seem to be pure invention on the part of the potter. It is difficult to find any influence either from Chinese porcelain or from contemporary silver. It is, however, entirely functional.
Materials & Making
Almost all surviving Staffordshire teapots of the 1720s are red earthenware with white mould-applied 'sprig' decoration of the type traditionally associated with Astbury of Fenton but also made by others. But here the potters have struggled to produce a range of decorative techniques to suit the comparatively new material, white salt-glazed stoneware. The thickness of the body has been reduced both by lathe-turning and by cutting flats around the belly, which offer flat surfaces for the simple mould-applied sprigs. There is abundant evidence of the potter's skill, from the hand-cutting of the body and spout to the elegant sweep of the handle with its fine knife-cut terminal. Before such pieces were mass-produced, potters took a delight in hand-finishing with a sharp knife. Some of the decorative elements, such as the mould-applied sprigs and rouletting (a band of ornament made by pressing a tool similar to a pastry cutter), were refined and developed later for mass-production, but the fashion for cut facets seems to have passed by the 1730s.
On this teapot, the definition of the applied ornament is blurred by a coating of fine white slip containing ground calcined flint (flint that has been baked in a furnace and ground to powder). Shortly afterwards this problem was overcome when the Dorset clay bodies were further refined and whitened.
The form and decoration of this teapot seem to be pure invention on the part of the potter. It is difficult to find any influence either from Chinese porcelain or from contemporary silver. It is, however, entirely functional.
Materials & Making
Almost all surviving Staffordshire teapots of the 1720s are red earthenware with white mould-applied 'sprig' decoration of the type traditionally associated with Astbury of Fenton but also made by others. But here the potters have struggled to produce a range of decorative techniques to suit the comparatively new material, white salt-glazed stoneware. The thickness of the body has been reduced both by lathe-turning and by cutting flats around the belly, which offer flat surfaces for the simple mould-applied sprigs. There is abundant evidence of the potter's skill, from the hand-cutting of the body and spout to the elegant sweep of the handle with its fine knife-cut terminal. Before such pieces were mass-produced, potters took a delight in hand-finishing with a sharp knife. Some of the decorative elements, such as the mould-applied sprigs and rouletting (a band of ornament made by pressing a tool similar to a pastry cutter), were refined and developed later for mass-production, but the fashion for cut facets seems to have passed by the 1730s.
On this teapot, the definition of the applied ornament is blurred by a coating of fine white slip containing ground calcined flint (flint that has been baked in a furnace and ground to powder). Shortly afterwards this problem was overcome when the Dorset clay bodies were further refined and whitened.
Object details
| Categories | |
| Object type | |
| Parts | This object consists of 2 parts.
|
| Materials and techniques | Salt-glazed stoneware, with rouletting, applied sprigs and brown slip decoration |
| Brief description | Thrown salt-glazed stoneware teapot with cut, rouletted and sprigged decoration, Staffordshire, about 1725-30. |
| Physical description | Thrown salt-glazed stoneware teapot with cut, rouletted and sprigged decoration, the top dipped in red-brown slip. |
| Dimensions |
|
| Gallery label | British Galleries:
The teapot is an early example of white Staffordshire stoneware. This is a highly practical ceramic body containing ground flint and white clays. Staffordshire potters used the new roads and canals to obtain these materials from other parts of the country.(27/03/2003) |
| Credit line | Bought with funds from the bequest of Francis Reuball Bryan |
| Object history | Probably made in Burslem, Staffordshire |
| Summary | Object Type The form and decoration of this teapot seem to be pure invention on the part of the potter. It is difficult to find any influence either from Chinese porcelain or from contemporary silver. It is, however, entirely functional. Materials & Making Almost all surviving Staffordshire teapots of the 1720s are red earthenware with white mould-applied 'sprig' decoration of the type traditionally associated with Astbury of Fenton but also made by others. But here the potters have struggled to produce a range of decorative techniques to suit the comparatively new material, white salt-glazed stoneware. The thickness of the body has been reduced both by lathe-turning and by cutting flats around the belly, which offer flat surfaces for the simple mould-applied sprigs. There is abundant evidence of the potter's skill, from the hand-cutting of the body and spout to the elegant sweep of the handle with its fine knife-cut terminal. Before such pieces were mass-produced, potters took a delight in hand-finishing with a sharp knife. Some of the decorative elements, such as the mould-applied sprigs and rouletting (a band of ornament made by pressing a tool similar to a pastry cutter), were refined and developed later for mass-production, but the fashion for cut facets seems to have passed by the 1730s. On this teapot, the definition of the applied ornament is blurred by a coating of fine white slip containing ground calcined flint (flint that has been baked in a furnace and ground to powder). Shortly afterwards this problem was overcome when the Dorset clay bodies were further refined and whitened. |
| Bibliographic reference | Hildyard, Robin. European Ceramics. London : V&A Publications, 1999. 144 p., ill. ISBN 185177260X |
| Collection | |
| Accession number | C.145:1, 2-1991 |
About this object record
Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
| Record created | November 29, 2002 |
| Record URL |
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest
