Bowl
25 BC - 50 AD (made)
Artist/Maker | |
Place of origin |
Mosaic glass, fused and slumped, applied foot. Clear marks of lathe turning around the outside of the rim and foot and on the interior of the bowl.
Object details
Categories | |
Object type | |
Materials and techniques | Mosaic glass, fused and slumped, with applied foot |
Brief description | Mosaic glass bowl, Roman Empire, probably Italy, 25 BC to 50 AD |
Physical description | Mosaic glass, fused and slumped, applied foot. Clear marks of lathe turning around the outside of the rim and foot and on the interior of the bowl. |
Dimensions |
|
Style | |
Gallery label | Purchased as 'antique Roman' but since the 1960s thought to be of more recent date, possibly 19th century. Recent sientific analysis has helped to reattribute this piece to the Roman period. |
Production | See Report on analysis by British Museum 1996 in Object info file and updated version of May 1999. These show that the chemical composition of the bowl is confirm those found for Roman glass and in some ways distinctly different from 19th-century glass from Venice. Cf. Sidney M. Goldstein, Pre-Roman...,Corning 1979, nr. 555 (afb. Pl. 30) = fragment of this type. David Grosse thought this to be not Roman but a 19th-century fake or copy. There is, however, no proof of a 19th-century origin, and the bowl shows some distinct differences in relation to known 19th-century pieces. The canes ued are unrecorded for this period. Its provenance in 1868 puts it earlier than any of the documentary evidence of Muranese mosaic glass as well as any known 19th-century pieces. David Grose examined the piece on 26-4-1999 and still thought that this piece is not Roman, for various reasons: 1 The cane sections are too large 2 Roman multi coloured 'flag' canes always consist of three layers, ours don't 3 The outside of the piece seems to be covered entirely with colourless glass. This is not the case with Roman examples. 4 The rim is too thin. 5 The ribs are too thin 6 The green is not of the right colour 7 The foot is added to the bowl, is not typical 8 There is no evidence of any corrosion 9 The foot is slightly too large for the bowl The scientific evidence is not 100% conclusive! |
Other number | 8068 - Glass gallery number |
Collection | |
Accession number | 969-1868 |
About this object record
Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
Record created | December 13, 1997 |
Record URL |
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest