Table thumbnail 1
Table thumbnail 2
+2
images
Image of Gallery in South Kensington
On display at V&A South Kensington
Medieval & Renaissance, Room 62, The Foyle Foundation Gallery

Table

1560-1600 (made)
Artist/Maker
Place of origin

This type of centre table with fixed supports was known from its fan-shaped supports as a table 'en éventail' (fan). Tables of this form have often been associated with Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau who published various, influential designs for similar tables from 1550, but he was not the inventor, since the form appeared in Italy from the 1520s, probably inspired by antique marble tables. Such tables were found in France by 1549, and the evidence of inventories suggests that they were considered highly fashionable in a well furnished room, and appropriate for dining, business or conversation with guests.Their impressive sculptural end pieces and their ornament derived from classical antiquity, distinguished them from the simple, standard trestle tables which had been used during the medieval period.


Object details

Categories
Object type
Materials and techniques
Walnut, carved
Brief description
Table, made in France, 1560-1600.
Physical description
Rectangular centre table 'en eventail' (with fan-shaped end supports). The top of joined, bread-board construction with a moulded edge, resting on mitred rails with a complex moulded edge and carved with lunettes with stylised acanthus. Each long rail has 2 angled mortises for lateral supports (now missing) that would have had to be fitted before the end rails were fitted. Each end rail has 3 cut outs suggesting it was fitted with a drawer leaf top at some point. The upper frame of rails supported on two matching end pieces, elaborately carved from a solid plank (about 9cm), built up in places, with traces of gesso and gilding; each end-piece formed by a youthful male term within and supporting a cartouche, and bearing a festoon of fruit, set on a pedestal with quatrefoil strapwork and a central oval boss, and grasping in each hand the tail of a harpy on lion legs and feet. Each end-piece is set on a projecting moulding with lunettes and corner gadroons, which rests on a single wide foot with double-scrolled ends, carved with low relief palmette and on the outside face a central oval boss, the whole foot set on two low rectangular pads. The two end pieces are joined at the top with a dovetailed central stretcher with 3 arches, carved with large palmette and acorn pendants below the keystones; which rests on two full, and two half pierced baluster supports which in turn rest on a lower stretcher (also jointed into the end pieces) with plain top and double ogee moulding carved with lunettes and gadroons.

Repairs and restoration
The table has apparently undergone substantial restoration before its acquisition in 1860, with the top restored (and recently conserved with locating blocks added), the upper rails probably replaced, judging by their lack of wear and movement, the lower stretcher completely replaced, one baluster replaced with a resin copy in about 1980, the acorns and baluster capitals apparently replaced, and various infill repairs to the arched stretcher and both feet. A dark stain appears to have been removed from both carved end pieces and the upper stretcher. From the evidence of cut-outs on the end rails, the table was fitted at some point with a draw-leaf top (as many tables of this kind are). A working hypothesis is that the top may be original, the rails replaced or adapted to take a drawer leaf top (now lost). It is possible that this table is not 16th century and restored, but constructed, probably 1800-1860 using matching end pieces of superb quality, combined with parts from other tables of a similar form and some 19th century elements. The evidence is not conclusive however, given the absence of a systematic study of surviving tables, the usual, extravagant combination of stylistic elements which make it difficult to judge on stylistic grounds only, and its current abraded surface. The degree of repair and restoration on this table is considerable, but not unusual in published tables of this form.
Dimensions
  • Height: 80.2cm
  • Width: 142cm
  • Depth: 73.1cm
Measured for the Medieval and Renaissance Galleries
Object history
Bought for £40 'Table of carved chestnut wood'

The table is depicted in a watercolour view of Marlborough House, Second Room (at the right, bearing two vases), signed and dated 1856 by William Linnaeus Casey (1835-70), museum no. 7280.

Jules Soulages, from whose collection this table came was a lawyer and antiquary based in Paris, and later Toulouse who collected renaissance furniture from the 1830s. On the basis of a plaque attached to another piece of furniture in the V&A's collection, also owned by Soulages, some of his furniture was restored by Ladousse in the workshops of the Toulouse Institute of Deaf-Mutes. It is not known where or when Soulages obtained this table but its close similarity to another, smaller table in the Paul-Dupuy collection (Toulouse) strongly suggests a local origin.

Pollen says: this table (and others) "belong to the class of furniture such as cabinets, dressers, dining-room presses, &c., specially designed by the architects of the day. The griffins, sphinxes, and other mythological animals that support this seem more or less to connect them with architectural facades or chimney-pieces."

Historical context
Thirion distinguishes this type of luxury table from simpler trestle tables of the kind widely used during the medieval period, and classes it as a piece of sculpture on account of its elaborate and distinctive end pieces, and he judges it to be one of the summits of furniture history in France. This type with fixed supports was usually known as a table 'en eventail' (fan-shaped). The type is often associated with Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau who published various, influential designs for such tables from 1550, but he was not the inventor, since the form appeared in Italy from the 1520s, probably inspired by antique marble tables. The type was however already found in France by 1549, and the evidence of inventories suggests that centre tables of this form, with their marked references to antiquity were considered fashionable, even necessary to the state rooms of the French elite, though there was considerable variety in their decoration, hardstone, marquetry and gilding all being used to enhance their impact. Bonnaffé suggests a Burgundy origin for the ostentatiously carved examples of this type, but the attribution should probably be taken with caution, as it seems certain that similar tables were produced more widely.

In Parures d’ Or et de Pourpre. Le mobilier à la cour des Valois. (Blois, 2002), no.23, p.126, Thierry Crepin-Leblond suggests that such (unprovenanced) tables may be considered the descendants of royal tables.

See Bonnaffé (pp.177-194) for a summary of the use of the table, the 'indispenable accessory of all festivities', at which correct behaviour and manners were an obligation, and court ceremonial elaborate. Gilles Corrozet's Les Blasons Domestiques (1539) suggests the varied role of the (trestle) table in France during the 16th century:
Bright table, shining table, table/ well fitted to the chamber, table/ well polished every day, table/ supported on two trestles, table/ which arouses the desire to take/ savoury pleasure in every choice/ meat. Table necessary to all people./ Table dressed with a cloth prepared/ for eating & drinking. Set with/ precious dishes and delicious good/ wines. Table full of chatter, Table/ where the great banquet is held on/ feast days or wedding days, table/ where business is discussed: then/ peace, then war, then France, then/ England. Then virtue, then folly,/ table polished like a mirror: table/ where each man takes his meal, for/ nourishment in measure. Oh/ virtuous and distinguished table,/ table of wood, Oh handsome table…

Examples of such tables were sought after by late 19th century collectors, probably because of their ostentatious carving, and the demand of the market will have contributed to the creation of tables using old and new parts, and the restoration of original tables. Koeppe illustrates two such tables from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, one as an example of honest repairs, the other as an example of a 19th century creation based on printed designs by Du Cerceau.

Comparable tables
Musée Paul Dupuy, Toulouse, illus. Thirion, p.136
Musée de l'Hôtel Lallement (Bourges), HWD: 86.5 x 149 x 87.5cm (Bourges; Legs Dubreuil 1928, inv.928.3.4) in Crepin-Leblond, Parures, p.126 no.23, attributed as French 16.3-4, and by Boccador to Ile-de-France (?).
Musée Vivenel de Compiègne (inv. L. 3653), illus. in E. Bonnaffé, Le Meuble en France au XVI siècle, Paris 1887, pp. 181, 190.
Musee des Beaux-Arts, Dijon, in Thirion, p.135 (91 x 170 x 88.5cm)

Further reading
Edmond Bonnaffé, Le Meuble en France au XVI siecle (Paris and London, 1887)
Les blasons domestiques by Gilles Corrozet, By Simon Jervis, in Furniture History (1989), pp.5-35
Parures d’ Or et de Pourpre. Le mobilier à la cour des Valois. (Blois, 2002)
Wolfram Koeppe, French Renaissance and Pseudo-Renaissance Furniture in American Collections, in Studies in the Decorative Arts/Spring 1994, pp.48-66
Jacques Thirion, Le Mobilier du Moyen Age et de la Renaissance en France (Dijon, 1998)
Production
restored, probably 1800-1860
Subjects depicted
Summary
This type of centre table with fixed supports was known from its fan-shaped supports as a table 'en éventail' (fan). Tables of this form have often been associated with Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau who published various, influential designs for similar tables from 1550, but he was not the inventor, since the form appeared in Italy from the 1520s, probably inspired by antique marble tables. Such tables were found in France by 1549, and the evidence of inventories suggests that they were considered highly fashionable in a well furnished room, and appropriate for dining, business or conversation with guests.Their impressive sculptural end pieces and their ornament derived from classical antiquity, distinguished them from the simple, standard trestle tables which had been used during the medieval period.
Bibliographic references
  • J.C.Robinson, Catalogue of the Soulages Collection: being a descriptive inventory of a collection of works of decorative art, formerly in the possession of M. Jules Soulages of Toulouse; now, by permission of the Committee of Privy Council for Trade, exhibited to the public at the Museum of Ornamental Art, Marlborough House (London 1856), no.659
  • Ancient and Modern Furniture & Woodwork in the South Kensington Museum, described with an introduction by John Hungerford Pollen, (London, 1874), p. 289. Table. Carved chestnut wood; a console table; the supports are griffins, coupled together with open strap-work ornaments. French. About 1560. H. 2 ft. 9 in., L. 4. ft. 7 in., W. 2. ft. 4 ½ in. Bought (Soulages Coll.), 40 l. These tables are supported by an arcade of three arches down the centre, and the grotesque animals stand at right angles to them on each end. The bale is similarly shaped, carved, and forms a sort of continuous plinth to the supports. This and the table next described, as well as Museum No. 7221-1860 belong to the class of furniture such as cabinets, dressers, dining-room presses &c., especially designed by the architects of the day. The griffins, sphinxes, and other mythological animals that support this seem more or less to connect them with architectural facades or chimney-pieces.
  • ROWE, Eleanor (ed.), Wood carvings from the South Kensington Museum. Folio IV. Domestic Furniture (London 1889), pl.LXXVIII
  • J Hungerford Pollen, Tables and table customs, in Magazine of Art, vol. IX, 1885-6, pp.105-9, fig I
  • Frederick Litchfield, Illustrated History of Furniture from the Earliest to the Present Time. 4th ed., London and New York: Truslove, Hanson and Comba Ltd., 1899, illustrated opp. p. 50.
Collection
Accession number
7216-1860

About this object record

Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.

You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.

Suggest feedback

Record createdMay 10, 2006
Record URL
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest