Drawing
c.1475-1525 (made)
This drawing of a lesser periwinkle is almost certainly a page from a manuscript herbal. We know that it was once part of a bound volume because three of the four edges of this sheet have been gilded. There are six companion pages in the V&A collection. The textile designer James Mitten once owned this drawing. He probably used it as source material when designing floral and foliage patterns.
Herbals were concerned with how plants could be used medicinally rather than how they could be identified and the illustrations were secondary to the authoritative text. Here, the lesser periwinkle is shown without its flowers, because its medicinal use came from the leaves. The drawing is accurate and shows how botanical illustrators were moving from using existing images as sources to studying directly from nature.
Herbals were concerned with how plants could be used medicinally rather than how they could be identified and the illustrations were secondary to the authoritative text. Here, the lesser periwinkle is shown without its flowers, because its medicinal use came from the leaves. The drawing is accurate and shows how botanical illustrators were moving from using existing images as sources to studying directly from nature.
Object details
Categories | |
Object type | |
Materials and techniques | Gouache on vellum |
Brief description | Artist unknown: page from a mansucript herbal showing the lessser periwinkle, late 15th or early 16th century. |
Dimensions |
|
Subject depicted | |
Summary | This drawing of a lesser periwinkle is almost certainly a page from a manuscript herbal. We know that it was once part of a bound volume because three of the four edges of this sheet have been gilded. There are six companion pages in the V&A collection. The textile designer James Mitten once owned this drawing. He probably used it as source material when designing floral and foliage patterns. Herbals were concerned with how plants could be used medicinally rather than how they could be identified and the illustrations were secondary to the authoritative text. Here, the lesser periwinkle is shown without its flowers, because its medicinal use came from the leaves. The drawing is accurate and shows how botanical illustrators were moving from using existing images as sources to studying directly from nature. |
Collection | |
Accession number | E.1046-1986 |
About this object record
Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
Record created | December 16, 2003 |
Record URL |
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest