Ring
1700-1800 (made)
| Artist/Maker | |
| Place of origin |
Object Type
Thumb rings of precious materials were worn by the emperor and his immediate circle throughout the Mughal period. They were made of jewelled and enamelled gold, as in this example, or from hardstones such as jade, agate or carnelian. Very rarely they were made from precious stones such as a single piece of emerald or garnet. Mughal paintings depict rings of this type in groups of two or three suspended on silken threads from sashes of the emperor or his sons. Such rings were also worn on the thumb. It is probable that they were emblems of royalty.
Materials & Making
One of the quintessential techniques of Indian jewellery is the use of kundan (highly refined gold) to set stones. Such jewellery is rarely solid gold, but is usually hollow, and then enamelled if this is part of the decorative scheme. Molten lac (a natural resin) is then poured into the hollow frame cavity. When the lac has cooled but is still slightly soft, precious stones are pushed into it over a layer of kundan. More kundan is then built up around the edges of the stone to secure it firmly.
People
The ring came from the collection of Colonel Arthur Seton Guthrie, who served in India with the Bengal Engineers from 1828 to 1857. He formed a considerable collection of Mughal hardstones, including thumb rings. He sold part of his collection to the Indian Museum (later absorbed into the collections of the South Kensington Museum, now the V&A) in 1868.
Design & Designing
The enamelled design on the inside of the ring is extremely unusual. It seems to have inspired pieces made by the London jeweller Robert Phillips (1810-1881) of Cockspur Street. He exhibited a necklace in the Paris International Exhibition of 1867 with an identical pattern enamelled in green on one side and red on the other. Red was a dominant colour for enamels on Mughal jewellery.
Thumb rings of precious materials were worn by the emperor and his immediate circle throughout the Mughal period. They were made of jewelled and enamelled gold, as in this example, or from hardstones such as jade, agate or carnelian. Very rarely they were made from precious stones such as a single piece of emerald or garnet. Mughal paintings depict rings of this type in groups of two or three suspended on silken threads from sashes of the emperor or his sons. Such rings were also worn on the thumb. It is probable that they were emblems of royalty.
Materials & Making
One of the quintessential techniques of Indian jewellery is the use of kundan (highly refined gold) to set stones. Such jewellery is rarely solid gold, but is usually hollow, and then enamelled if this is part of the decorative scheme. Molten lac (a natural resin) is then poured into the hollow frame cavity. When the lac has cooled but is still slightly soft, precious stones are pushed into it over a layer of kundan. More kundan is then built up around the edges of the stone to secure it firmly.
People
The ring came from the collection of Colonel Arthur Seton Guthrie, who served in India with the Bengal Engineers from 1828 to 1857. He formed a considerable collection of Mughal hardstones, including thumb rings. He sold part of his collection to the Indian Museum (later absorbed into the collections of the South Kensington Museum, now the V&A) in 1868.
Design & Designing
The enamelled design on the inside of the ring is extremely unusual. It seems to have inspired pieces made by the London jeweller Robert Phillips (1810-1881) of Cockspur Street. He exhibited a necklace in the Paris International Exhibition of 1867 with an identical pattern enamelled in green on one side and red on the other. Red was a dominant colour for enamels on Mughal jewellery.
Object details
| Categories | |
| Object type | |
| Materials and techniques | Gold, set with diamonds and enamelled in translucent green and blue, with black and white |
| Brief description | Jewellery |
| Dimensions |
|
| Gallery label | British Galleries:
A MUGHAL RING AND THE NECKLACE IT INSPIRED This necklace was made in London in 1867. It was directly inspired by the inner surface of the Indian ring shown alongside. At the time the ring was probably in the collection of Colonel Guthrie, who had served in India with the Bengal Engineers. However, the necklace pendants follow European, not Indian, techniques of construction.(27/03/2003) |
| Object history | Made in the Mughal empire, Indian subcontinent |
| Production | Made in the Mughal Empire, Indian subcontinent |
| Summary | Object Type Thumb rings of precious materials were worn by the emperor and his immediate circle throughout the Mughal period. They were made of jewelled and enamelled gold, as in this example, or from hardstones such as jade, agate or carnelian. Very rarely they were made from precious stones such as a single piece of emerald or garnet. Mughal paintings depict rings of this type in groups of two or three suspended on silken threads from sashes of the emperor or his sons. Such rings were also worn on the thumb. It is probable that they were emblems of royalty. Materials & Making One of the quintessential techniques of Indian jewellery is the use of kundan (highly refined gold) to set stones. Such jewellery is rarely solid gold, but is usually hollow, and then enamelled if this is part of the decorative scheme. Molten lac (a natural resin) is then poured into the hollow frame cavity. When the lac has cooled but is still slightly soft, precious stones are pushed into it over a layer of kundan. More kundan is then built up around the edges of the stone to secure it firmly. People The ring came from the collection of Colonel Arthur Seton Guthrie, who served in India with the Bengal Engineers from 1828 to 1857. He formed a considerable collection of Mughal hardstones, including thumb rings. He sold part of his collection to the Indian Museum (later absorbed into the collections of the South Kensington Museum, now the V&A) in 1868. Design & Designing The enamelled design on the inside of the ring is extremely unusual. It seems to have inspired pieces made by the London jeweller Robert Phillips (1810-1881) of Cockspur Street. He exhibited a necklace in the Paris International Exhibition of 1867 with an identical pattern enamelled in green on one side and red on the other. Red was a dominant colour for enamels on Mughal jewellery. |
| Bibliographic references |
|
| Collection | |
| Accession number | 02528(IS) |
About this object record
Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
| Record created | March 28, 2003 |
| Record URL |
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest
