Image of Gallery in South Kensington
On display at V&A South Kensington
British Galleries, Room 52b

Chalice Veil

ca. 1708 (made)
Artist/Maker
Place of origin

Object Type
This square of woven silk was originally intended for clothing. It might have been chosen for a woman's gown, a man's waistcoat or his nightgown, worn informally at home. The complexity of its woven structure and the amount of silver thread would have made it expensive, while its bold pattern would have been highly fashionable for a fairly brief period only. For both of these reasons it may have been passed on to the church for re-use.

Design & Designing
The silk is thought to be English, dating from about 1708, because of its similarity to designs of this date by James Leman. Leman was born into a weaving family of Huguenot descent and was apprenticed to his father, on whose death he took over the family business in Spitalfields, London. He trained as a designer as well as a manufacturer, very unusually for the English industry. His dated designs from the early 18th century are the earliest proof of the high standards being achieved in English silk-weaving in competition with imports from France.


Object details

Categories
Object type
Materials and techniques
Silk satin with patterning wefts of silver thread
Brief description
Chalice veil, patterned silk, English, Spitalfields, ca.1708.
Physical description
The chalice veil is composed of a yellow and silver woven silk front, edged with silver gilt braid and backed with pink silk. The patterned silk has a ground of yellow satin and a pattern weft of silver thread. It is complete selvedge to selvedge, with just over one complete repeat in height. The design is of leaves, fruit and flowers, very stylised.
Dimensions
  • Height: 51cm
  • Width: 51cm
Gallery label
British Galleries: This chalice veil, for use during the Roman Catholic Mass, has been made from a piece of silk dress fabric. High quality silks were sometimes passed to the Church for reuse when they were no longer fashionable for dress but were too valuable to discard. The silver thread is tarnished and would originally have been much brighter.(27/03/2003)
Object history
The design of the silk closely resembles the work of James Leman. It can be dated fairly precisely by comparison with the Leman designs in Designs, Prints and Drawings to ca. 1708 and is likely to have been designed by him or a rival in imitation of his style. Although it was found by a dealer in France and is part of an ecclesiastical set which generally suggests a continental origin, in every other way the silk appears to be English (Spitalfields).

Purchased. Registered File number 1993/2065.
Summary
Object Type
This square of woven silk was originally intended for clothing. It might have been chosen for a woman's gown, a man's waistcoat or his nightgown, worn informally at home. The complexity of its woven structure and the amount of silver thread would have made it expensive, while its bold pattern would have been highly fashionable for a fairly brief period only. For both of these reasons it may have been passed on to the church for re-use.

Design & Designing
The silk is thought to be English, dating from about 1708, because of its similarity to designs of this date by James Leman. Leman was born into a weaving family of Huguenot descent and was apprenticed to his father, on whose death he took over the family business in Spitalfields, London. He trained as a designer as well as a manufacturer, very unusually for the English industry. His dated designs from the early 18th century are the earliest proof of the high standards being achieved in English silk-weaving in competition with imports from France.
Collection
Accession number
T.3-1994

About this object record

Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.

You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.

Suggest feedback

Record createdMarch 27, 2003
Record URL
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest