An Unknown Woman
Portrait Miniature
ca. 1675 (painted)
ca. 1675 (painted)
Artist/Maker | |
Place of origin |
The word ‘miniature’ describes a technique of painting in watercolour rather than the size of a painting. Miniature painting developed as a separate art in the 16th century and in Britain it became predominantly a portrait art.
This miniature was formerly thought to be of Louise de Keroualle, Duchess of Portsmouth and one of Charles II’s mistresses. Although not Louise, she must be a lady of the court. Nicholas Dixon was at the height of his fortunes at this time having succeeded Samuel Cooper to the coveted post of King’s limner in 1672. The bold and unusually elaborate execution is indicative of the way his style adapted to his clientele at court. The use in particular of gold in rendering the gold of the earring was unusual in late 17th-century miniatures when yellow paint was generally used to simulate the desired effect. The whole effect, extravagant in its colour and palpably sensuous in its appeal surely indicates that the sitter was special, perhaps one of the ladies close to the monarch.
In the 1670s flesh was in fashion and Dixon was clearly influenced by Peter Lely’s round faced figurative style and his almond shaped, elongated eyes, half-closed, which according to one commentator ‘convey languorous lasciviousness’. These mannerisms were particularly noticeable in Lely’s portraits of the Beauties of Charles II’s court, painted 1666–8. At this time, however, it was Charles II’s mistresses who led the way at court in terms of fashion, and not the Queen as had been true in Charles I’s day. This miniature is a particularly arch example of this tendency.
This miniature was formerly thought to be of Louise de Keroualle, Duchess of Portsmouth and one of Charles II’s mistresses. Although not Louise, she must be a lady of the court. Nicholas Dixon was at the height of his fortunes at this time having succeeded Samuel Cooper to the coveted post of King’s limner in 1672. The bold and unusually elaborate execution is indicative of the way his style adapted to his clientele at court. The use in particular of gold in rendering the gold of the earring was unusual in late 17th-century miniatures when yellow paint was generally used to simulate the desired effect. The whole effect, extravagant in its colour and palpably sensuous in its appeal surely indicates that the sitter was special, perhaps one of the ladies close to the monarch.
In the 1670s flesh was in fashion and Dixon was clearly influenced by Peter Lely’s round faced figurative style and his almond shaped, elongated eyes, half-closed, which according to one commentator ‘convey languorous lasciviousness’. These mannerisms were particularly noticeable in Lely’s portraits of the Beauties of Charles II’s court, painted 1666–8. At this time, however, it was Charles II’s mistresses who led the way at court in terms of fashion, and not the Queen as had been true in Charles I’s day. This miniature is a particularly arch example of this tendency.
Object details
Categories | |
Object type | |
Title | An Unknown Woman (generic title) |
Materials and techniques | Watercolour on vellum put down on a leaf from a table-book |
Brief description | Portrait miniature of an unknown woman, watercolour on vellum, painted by Nicholas Dixon, ca.1675. |
Physical description | Portrait of a woman, half-length, to front, head turned slightly to left, and wearing a decolletage dress decorated with pearls, a pearl earring in the left ear and a pearl necklace. Features hatched in brown and sanguine, blended with gouache and some white heightening in the eyes, on a very pale carnation ground; hair in brown wash, hatched with darker colour and heightened with gouache, over the carnation; dress in pale blue wash overlaid with darker colour and heightened with white; chemise and pearls in grey wash, heightened with white and with touches of grey and black; a touch of gold in the ear-ring; background in green-brown washes, hatched diagonally top right to lower left; on vellum put down on a leaf from a table-book. Frame: Seventeenth-century oval gold locket, convex back, the sides with a single narrow channel, flaring out to the bezel, which holds the flat glass by its rounded edges; at the base of the oval there are two dark marks and evidence of filing, which suggests that the locket may originally have had a hinged front cover; the hanger of D-section grooved down the middle, tooled on the ridges and with two narrow outer flanges, bifurcating into diminishing spirals of three turns; below the hanger, and unusually well integrated with it, there is an arrangement of engraved scroll-and-line ornament. |
Dimensions |
|
Content description | Portrait of a woman wearing a blue dress and pearl necklace and earring. |
Styles | |
Marks and inscriptions | 'ND' (Signed lower centre left, in black) |
Credit line | Given by National Art Collections Fund |
Object history | Provenance: Buccleuch Collection; purchased as part of a group by the NACF, 1942, and presented to the Museum. |
Subjects depicted | |
Summary | The word ‘miniature’ describes a technique of painting in watercolour rather than the size of a painting. Miniature painting developed as a separate art in the 16th century and in Britain it became predominantly a portrait art. This miniature was formerly thought to be of Louise de Keroualle, Duchess of Portsmouth and one of Charles II’s mistresses. Although not Louise, she must be a lady of the court. Nicholas Dixon was at the height of his fortunes at this time having succeeded Samuel Cooper to the coveted post of King’s limner in 1672. The bold and unusually elaborate execution is indicative of the way his style adapted to his clientele at court. The use in particular of gold in rendering the gold of the earring was unusual in late 17th-century miniatures when yellow paint was generally used to simulate the desired effect. The whole effect, extravagant in its colour and palpably sensuous in its appeal surely indicates that the sitter was special, perhaps one of the ladies close to the monarch. In the 1670s flesh was in fashion and Dixon was clearly influenced by Peter Lely’s round faced figurative style and his almond shaped, elongated eyes, half-closed, which according to one commentator ‘convey languorous lasciviousness’. These mannerisms were particularly noticeable in Lely’s portraits of the Beauties of Charles II’s court, painted 1666–8. At this time, however, it was Charles II’s mistresses who led the way at court in terms of fashion, and not the Queen as had been true in Charles I’s day. This miniature is a particularly arch example of this tendency. |
Bibliographic references |
|
Collection | |
Accession number | P.4-1942 |
About this object record
Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
Record created | February 25, 2003 |
Record URL |
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest