Not currently on display at the V&A

Spectacle Case and Spectacles

Artist/Maker
Place Of Origin

This spectacle case may have belonged to James II, although the folding spectacles most certainly were made several decades after his death in exile in 1701. The painted mother-of-pearl case is of the very highest quality - certainly fit for a king's use - and was probably made in France. Folding spectacles are mentioned in the advertisement of a French maker in 1745. They are described as 'in the English style'. It is likely that folding spectacles had been made for a decade or so before 1745, but there is no evidence that they were made during the lifetime of James II.

A letter that accompanied the spectacles, written at the end of the 18th century, describes in detail how the case passed by gift from James's son, the Old Pretender, through several hands, until it came into the possession of a Mr Walker in 1770. By that time it must have been revered as a Jacobite relic by those who favoured the Stuart claim to the English throne.


object details
Categories
Object Type
Parts
This object consists of 3 parts.

  • Spectacle Case
  • Spectacles
  • Letter
Brief Description
Spectacle case of painted and gilded mother-of-pearl, ca. 1685-1688, containing a later pair of tortoise-shell and silver folding spectacles of 1700-1725, probably made in France
Physical Description
Spectacle case of painted and gilded mother-of-pearl, containing a later pair of folding spectacles, of tortoise-shell and silver
Dimensions
  • Spectacle case height: 5.3cm
  • Spectacle case width: 8.5cm
  • Spectacle case depth: 1.2cm
  • Spectacle (opened) height: 4.6cm
  • Spectacle (opened) width: 8.9cm
  • Spectacle (opened) depth: 0.4cm
  • Spectacle (folded) height: 5.8cm
  • Spectacle (folded) width: 3.9cm
  • Spectacle (folded) depth: 0.9cm
Gallery Label
PAIR OF SPECTACLES IN CASE ENGLISH; about 1685-8 Painted mother-of-pearl They are reputed to have belonged to James II (1685-8)(pre October 2000)
Object history
Spectacles in Case, purchased for £125 on 17 December 1969 from R M Pigot Esq, Pantiles, Great Hautbois, Norwich. RF 69/3498

Production
The case may date from as early as ca. 1685 but the folding spectacles are unlikely to be any earlier than 1735-40
Summary
This spectacle case may have belonged to James II, although the folding spectacles most certainly were made several decades after his death in exile in 1701. The painted mother-of-pearl case is of the very highest quality - certainly fit for a king's use - and was probably made in France. Folding spectacles are mentioned in the advertisement of a French maker in 1745. They are described as 'in the English style'. It is likely that folding spectacles had been made for a decade or so before 1745, but there is no evidence that they were made during the lifetime of James II.



A letter that accompanied the spectacles, written at the end of the 18th century, describes in detail how the case passed by gift from James's son, the Old Pretender, through several hands, until it came into the possession of a Mr Walker in 1770. By that time it must have been revered as a Jacobite relic by those who favoured the Stuart claim to the English throne.
Bibliographic References
  • Macgregor, Ronald J.S.'Opthalmic Antiques. Newlsetter of the Ophthalmic Antiques International Collectors Club'. Number 66. January 1999, pp.4-6. Copy in files of Furniture, Textiles and Fashion Department
  • David Forsyth (ed.), Bonnie Prince Charlie and the Jacobites (catalogue to the exhibition at National Museum of Scotland, 23 June to 12 November 2017), Edinburgh 2017, cat. 44, pp.203-204
Collection
Accession Number
W.5 to B-1970

About this object record

Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.

You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.

Suggest Feedback

record createdJanuary 24, 2001
Record URL