We don’t have an image of this object online yet. V&A Images may have a photograph that we can’t show online, but it may be possible to supply one to you. Email us at vaimages@vam.ac.uk for guidance about fees and timescales, quoting the accession number: T.400-1972
Find out about our images

Image of Gallery in South Kensington
Request to view at the Prints & Drawings Study Room, level C , Case 3H, Shelf 18

Design

1761 (Designed and made)
Artist/Maker
Place of origin

This design is a preparatory technical drawing for a patterned silk. It acted as instructions for the weaver about how to tie up the threads on the loom and then weave in the pattern. It belongs to an archive of similar designs commissioned by a silk manufacturing partnership active in Lyon — the most prestigious centre of the silk industry in Europe from the 1660s onwards — and corresponds in style to the 1760s when patterns were curvaceous. The partnership was called L. Galy, Gallien et cie from 1761 until the beginning of 1771 and it was one of Lyon’s 400 manufacturing concerns mid-century. It kept good records, noting on the back of the designs the number of the design and minimal instructions on how it should be woven.

This design was for a patterned silk with a plain background, approximately 54 centimetres wide. It would have had this motif repeated across the width at least twice. In Lyon, manufacturing regulations dictated the widths in which such silks might be woven.


Object details

Category
Object type
Materials and techniques
Engraved rule paper, painted in gouache
Brief description
for woven silk, 1761, French; Galy Gallien, red lace meanders, stripes, flowers
Physical description
Mise-en-carte or draft, in watercolour on ruled paper (engraved copper plate used for impression). Red lace meanders, stripes, and flowers
Dimensions
  • Height: 37.2cm
  • Width: 52.8cm
Style
Production typeDesign
Marks and inscriptions
L. Galy Gallien et Cie, 19 S[eptem] 1761 No. 615 Taff [eta] en Soye B[roch]e Cordonnet nue 35 dix[ain]es à Répétition (There follow instructions for combining the colours of the weft into six lashes on the loom. The fifth shoot contains five different colours.)
Translation
Silk taffeta brocaded with coloured silk frisé 35 dezines in the repeat
Production
Attribution note: These designs were painted by a designer who was conversant with the weaving process. Each space between the lines represents groups of warp (vertical) and weft (horizontal) threads.
Subjects depicted
Summary
This design is a preparatory technical drawing for a patterned silk. It acted as instructions for the weaver about how to tie up the threads on the loom and then weave in the pattern. It belongs to an archive of similar designs commissioned by a silk manufacturing partnership active in Lyon — the most prestigious centre of the silk industry in Europe from the 1660s onwards — and corresponds in style to the 1760s when patterns were curvaceous. The partnership was called L. Galy, Gallien et cie from 1761 until the beginning of 1771 and it was one of Lyon’s 400 manufacturing concerns mid-century. It kept good records, noting on the back of the designs the number of the design and minimal instructions on how it should be woven.

This design was for a patterned silk with a plain background, approximately 54 centimetres wide. It would have had this motif repeated across the width at least twice. In Lyon, manufacturing regulations dictated the widths in which such silks might be woven.
Bibliographic references
  • Natalie Rothstein. Silk Designs of the Eighteenth Century. In the Collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, London, 1990, p.249.
  • Lesley Ellis Miller, 'Mysterious Manufacturers: Situating L. Galy, Gallien et Compe. in the Eighteenth-Century Lyons Silk Industry', Studies in the Decorative Arts, Vol. IX:2, Spring-summer 2002, p. 90
Collection
Accession number
T.400-1972

About this object record

Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.

You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.

Suggest feedback

Record createdJune 24, 2009
Record URL
Download as: JSON