Bowl Fragment
1250-1350 (made)
Artist/Maker | |
Place of origin |
Rim fragment from a small conical bowl, probably originally with a shallow profile. It is glazed on the exterior with a lead glaze and on the interior with an opaque tin-glaze. It is painted with a monochrome silver/copper lustre on the interior only.
Its decoration consists of a geometric interlace pattern at the centre, surrounded by a wide frieze of vegetal scrolls border below the vertical rim.
Technical Description
The original diameter of this bowl can be extrapolated at 23 cm. It probably came down to quite a small base (of roughly the same size as C.1606-1927 ie approx 7 cm), since the thickness of the body starts to narrow as it approaches the foot. It was therefore not very big bowl originally and probably had quite a shallow profile.
The clay is very fine and well-levigated. It is very red in colour. The tin-glaze is thick and white, indicating that a large amount of tin oxide has been used in the glaze mixture. The application of the lustre decoration suggests it has been painted on with a brush. It is a good quality lustre .
There is a tripod scar at the bottom pointed corner which also has a bit of glaze stuck to it from the bowl which would have originally been stacked inside this bowl during the firing.
It is very smooth on the back indicating that it has been turned with a tool. Long dragging areas in the concentric marks on the back indicate where a bit of clay has been caught in the tool as it was turning, probably on a wheel. There is no decoration on the exterior, which seems to have been glazed with a less expensive lead glaze.
Its decoration consists of a geometric interlace pattern at the centre, surrounded by a wide frieze of vegetal scrolls border below the vertical rim.
Technical Description
The original diameter of this bowl can be extrapolated at 23 cm. It probably came down to quite a small base (of roughly the same size as C.1606-1927 ie approx 7 cm), since the thickness of the body starts to narrow as it approaches the foot. It was therefore not very big bowl originally and probably had quite a shallow profile.
The clay is very fine and well-levigated. It is very red in colour. The tin-glaze is thick and white, indicating that a large amount of tin oxide has been used in the glaze mixture. The application of the lustre decoration suggests it has been painted on with a brush. It is a good quality lustre .
There is a tripod scar at the bottom pointed corner which also has a bit of glaze stuck to it from the bowl which would have originally been stacked inside this bowl during the firing.
It is very smooth on the back indicating that it has been turned with a tool. Long dragging areas in the concentric marks on the back indicate where a bit of clay has been caught in the tool as it was turning, probably on a wheel. There is no decoration on the exterior, which seems to have been glazed with a less expensive lead glaze.
Object details
Category | |
Object type | |
Materials and techniques | Tin-glazed earthenware painted with a monochrome silver/copper lustre |
Brief description | Fragment of a bowl, made in Málaga, Spain, 1250-1350, tin-glazed earthenware with lustre decoration |
Physical description | Rim fragment from a small conical bowl, probably originally with a shallow profile. It is glazed on the exterior with a lead glaze and on the interior with an opaque tin-glaze. It is painted with a monochrome silver/copper lustre on the interior only. Its decoration consists of a geometric interlace pattern at the centre, surrounded by a wide frieze of vegetal scrolls border below the vertical rim. Technical Description The original diameter of this bowl can be extrapolated at 23 cm. It probably came down to quite a small base (of roughly the same size as C.1606-1927 ie approx 7 cm), since the thickness of the body starts to narrow as it approaches the foot. It was therefore not very big bowl originally and probably had quite a shallow profile. The clay is very fine and well-levigated. It is very red in colour. The tin-glaze is thick and white, indicating that a large amount of tin oxide has been used in the glaze mixture. The application of the lustre decoration suggests it has been painted on with a brush. It is a good quality lustre . There is a tripod scar at the bottom pointed corner which also has a bit of glaze stuck to it from the bowl which would have originally been stacked inside this bowl during the firing. It is very smooth on the back indicating that it has been turned with a tool. Long dragging areas in the concentric marks on the back indicate where a bit of clay has been caught in the tool as it was turning, probably on a wheel. There is no decoration on the exterior, which seems to have been glazed with a less expensive lead glaze. |
Dimensions |
|
Gallery label | Fragment, bowl
Made in Málaga, Granada, Spain 1250-1350
Tin-glazed earthenware with lustre decoration
1186-1897 Gift of Major W.J. Myers(16/07/2008) |
Credit line | Given by Major W. J. Myers |
Object history | This object was found at Fustat (Egypt). It was presented to the V&A by Major W. J. Myers in 1897, before official excavations began at the site. Comparative Study This object has exactly the same decoration as another bowl fragment in the V&A collection, also found at Fustat: C.789-1921, published in Ray (2000), cat. no. 3 which he tentatively dates to the late 13th century. The two fragments do not fit together so they do not come from the same object. The decoration of both bowls is also the same as the fragments from the lid of a conical bowl (C.788-1921; Ray (2000), cat. no. 2), indicating that lids and bowls must have originally been made with matching decoration. |
Bibliographic references |
|
Collection | |
Accession number | 1186-1897 |
About this object record
Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
Record created | July 16, 2008 |
Record URL |
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest