Dish thumbnail 1
Image of Gallery in South Kensington
On display at V&A South Kensington
Medieval & Renaissance, Room 62, The Foyle Foundation Gallery

Dish

1595-1625 (made)
Artist/Maker
Place of origin

This dish is an example of a mass-produced Chinese porcelain carried to Europe in Dutch ships in the late 16th/early 17th century. Porcelains made for the European market are of a different quality to those made for the Chinese court. The painted decoration is usually very sketchy, the stock of designs fairly limited. The most common decorative pattern is that of panels enclosing plants or animals, as on this dish.


Object details

Category
Object type
Materials and techniques
Porcelain painted in underglaze cobalt blue
Brief description
Cer, China, Ming, blue and white
Physical description
Flat rim, lobed edge, the front painted on the centre with two water-fowls by a pond, one flying and one standing on the shore. Eight panels around the rim, each panel enclosing a floral design which is so sketchily drawn that, apart from the lotus, it is not possible to identify what species they are meant to represent. Within three of the panels a bird, a frog and a moth have been added, all sketchily drawn. The back of the dish is painted with eight wider panels alternating with narrower panels, the wider panels enclosing a lingzhi (magic fungus) or a butterfly.
Dimensions
  • Diameter: 21cm
Style
Marks and inscriptions
An egret painted on base
Credit line
Seawell bequest
Historical context
This dish is an example of a mass-produced Chinese porcelain carried to Europe in Dutch ships in the late 16th/early 17th century. By that time Chinese porcelain had become more affordable to European consumers thanks to improved shipping. Orders from Dutch and Protuguese traders happened to arrive at Jingdezhen, the porcelain city in southern China, at a time when patronage from the Chinese court was in drastic decline. Porcelains made for the European market are of a different quality to those made for the Chinese court. The former shows a number of characteristics that make it possible for ceramic historians to study them as a distinct category, under the rubric of 'Kraak porcelain'.
The painted decoration is usually very sketchy, the stock of designs fairly limited. The most common decorative pattern is that of panels enclosing plants or animals. The arrangements of the panels changed with times, enabling ceramic historians to work out a chronology of the production dates of Kraak porcelain. The pattern on the present dish falls within the 'Border IV' group, which is defined as 'equal-sized panels filled with delicate flowers, insects or birds'.
An egret is painted on the base of the dish. Ceramic historians are still unable to come up with a satisfactory explanation for this peculiar symbol. It is not the symbol of a particular kiln, because the wares carrying this symbol are of varying qualities, ranging from coarse to the very fine.
Although Kraak porcelain must have generated much income for China, Chinese records about its production and export hardly exist today. Scholars rely on records of the various East India companies in Europe. Cargoes from several shipwrecks discovered in the 20th century provide additional information about a commodity that had once played an important role in Sino-European trade.
Production
Border IV
Summary
This dish is an example of a mass-produced Chinese porcelain carried to Europe in Dutch ships in the late 16th/early 17th century. Porcelains made for the European market are of a different quality to those made for the Chinese court. The painted decoration is usually very sketchy, the stock of designs fairly limited. The most common decorative pattern is that of panels enclosing plants or animals, as on this dish.
Bibliographic reference
Rinaldi, Kraak Porcelain, p.200
Collection
Accession number
C.792-1917

About this object record

Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.

You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.

Suggest feedback

Record createdJanuary 3, 2006
Record URL
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest