Layette Footwear Set
1923 (made)
'Blue for a boy; pink for a girl' is a comparatively modern idea. Its firm use probably dates from the early decades of the twentieth century, and has been encouraged by producers of greetings cards and baby books.
It all seems to begin with blue, which has been associated with sky spirits and regarded as a protective colour from ancient times. Its use as an amulet could be extended to any prized asset, such as one's boat, or horse, as well as to humans. In many cultures, women often did inherit businesses or estates, but male heirs were preferred for strength and for preserving family identity. There seems also to be some evidence that male babies may be biologically weaker than the females, so more in need of protection.
But in those communities which are predominantly Roman Catholic, blue is a colour which is associated with the Virgin Mary, and so was often thought more appropriate for girls. Pink was then used to designate boys: it can be linked with red, which is sometimes associated with St Joseph. The pagan version of this is a European legend about birth: boys come from under blue cabbages and girls from inside pink roses. Pink for boys and blue for girls was also found in the UK, and although blue for boys and pink for girls was gaining in popularity during the 19th century, the Women's Institute were still issuing booklets recommending pink for boys and blue for girls as late as 1921.
It all seems to begin with blue, which has been associated with sky spirits and regarded as a protective colour from ancient times. Its use as an amulet could be extended to any prized asset, such as one's boat, or horse, as well as to humans. In many cultures, women often did inherit businesses or estates, but male heirs were preferred for strength and for preserving family identity. There seems also to be some evidence that male babies may be biologically weaker than the females, so more in need of protection.
But in those communities which are predominantly Roman Catholic, blue is a colour which is associated with the Virgin Mary, and so was often thought more appropriate for girls. Pink was then used to designate boys: it can be linked with red, which is sometimes associated with St Joseph. The pagan version of this is a European legend about birth: boys come from under blue cabbages and girls from inside pink roses. Pink for boys and blue for girls was also found in the UK, and although blue for boys and pink for girls was gaining in popularity during the 19th century, the Women's Institute were still issuing booklets recommending pink for boys and blue for girls as late as 1921.
Object details
Object type | |
Parts | This object consists of 17 parts.
|
Brief description | Card box covered in pink ribbed silk and lined with pink silk, probably made in England in 1923 Baby's shoe of gold-coloured kid leather probably made in England in 1923 Baby's shoe of gold-coloured kid leather probably made in England in 1923 Baby's slipper of pink satin with a white leather sole and pink ribbon ties; probably made in England in 1923 Baby's slipper of pink satin with a white leather sole and pink ribbon ties; probably made in England in 1923 Pochette for pair of baby slippers of pink satin with a white satin lining and pink ribbon ties; probably made in England in 1923 Baby's bootee of white lace over pink satin probably made in England in 1923 Baby's bootee of white lace over pink satin probably made in England in 1923 Baby's bootee of pink satin probably made in England in 1923 Baby's bootee of pink satin probably made in England in 1923 Baby's sock of white machine knitted silk probably made in England in 1923 Baby's sock of white machine knitted silk probably made in England in 1923 Baby's sock of pink machine knitted silk probably made in England in 1923 Baby's sock of pink machine knitted silk probably made in England in 1923 Baby's sock of pink machine knitted silk probably made in England in 1923 Baby's sock of pink machine knitted silk probably made in England in 1923 |
Dimensions |
|
Object history | This was a present from a well-wisher to Princess Mary, the only daughter of George V, in 1923. She had married the Earl of Harewood in 1922, and was expecting her first baby. He was a boy, George, and in the UK by then pink was associated with girls and was considered inappropriate. The next baby was also a boy, Gerald, and so the socks and shoes were returned to the donor (the accompanying letter is still with the box). |
Summary | 'Blue for a boy; pink for a girl' is a comparatively modern idea. Its firm use probably dates from the early decades of the twentieth century, and has been encouraged by producers of greetings cards and baby books. It all seems to begin with blue, which has been associated with sky spirits and regarded as a protective colour from ancient times. Its use as an amulet could be extended to any prized asset, such as one's boat, or horse, as well as to humans. In many cultures, women often did inherit businesses or estates, but male heirs were preferred for strength and for preserving family identity. There seems also to be some evidence that male babies may be biologically weaker than the females, so more in need of protection. But in those communities which are predominantly Roman Catholic, blue is a colour which is associated with the Virgin Mary, and so was often thought more appropriate for girls. Pink was then used to designate boys: it can be linked with red, which is sometimes associated with St Joseph. The pagan version of this is a European legend about birth: boys come from under blue cabbages and girls from inside pink roses. Pink for boys and blue for girls was also found in the UK, and although blue for boys and pink for girls was gaining in popularity during the 19th century, the Women's Institute were still issuing booklets recommending pink for boys and blue for girls as late as 1921. |
Collection | |
Accession number | MISC.449&1 to 15-1980 |
About this object record
Explore the Collections contains over a million catalogue records, and over half a million images. It is a working database that includes information compiled over the life of the museum. Some of our records may contain offensive and discriminatory language, or reflect outdated ideas, practice and analysis. We are committed to addressing these issues, and to review and update our records accordingly.
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
You can write to us to suggest improvements to the record.
Suggest feedback
Record created | July 1, 2009 |
Record URL |
Download as: JSONIIIF Manifest